Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca fiercely questions the US’s suitability for major tournaments after Club World Cup weather delays. Explore Enzo Maresca’s concerns about competitive integrity & the implications for the 2026 World Cup. Read his full remarks and analysis.
Table of Contents
Enzo Maresca Questions US Club World Cup Hosting: A Deep Dive into Competitive Integrity and Future Tournaments
The world of elite football is accustomed to its meticulously planned schedules, tactical battles, and uninterrupted flow. However, recent events at the Club World Cup in the United States have introduced a jarring element: prolonged weather-related stoppages. At the heart of this unfolding narrative is Enzo Maresca, the Chelsea manager, whose strong remarks have ignited a crucial debate. His candid observations, particularly after Chelsea’s encounter with Benfica, raise significant questions about the suitability of certain host nations for major FIFA competitions, especially with the monumental 2026 World Cup on the horizon across North America.
The Unforeseen Challenge: Enzo Maresca and the Club World Cup Disruption
When quizzed about the extraordinary one-hour and fifty-three-minute stoppage during Chelsea’s Club World Cup match against Benfica, Enzo Maresca’s response was succinct and striking: “This is not football.” His words encapsulated a growing frustration not just for his team, but for the very essence of the sport. The match, which Chelsea ultimately won 4-1 to qualify for the quarter-finals, became a talking point less for the scoreline and more for the unprecedented interruption. It was, in fact, the sixth game in the tournament to face suspension due to seasonal summer thunderstorms. This pattern forced Enzo Maresca to openly question the wisdom of hosting such high-stakes tournaments in regions prone to such dramatic weather phenomena.
A Match Interrupted: Maresca’s Assessment of the Stoppage Impact
Before the near two-hour delay, Chelsea appeared to be in complete control. They had not conceded a single shot on target and were ahead, thanks to Reece James’s inventive free-kick. The momentum was firmly with the London club, and a comfortable victory seemed assured. However, the abrupt halt dramatically altered the dynamics. Enzo Maresca reflected on this shift with evident concern: “For 85 minutes we were in control of the game. We didn’t concede anything; we created chances enough to win the game. And then after the break the game changed completely.”
The change was indeed stark. After the prolonged indoor break, Benfica’s Angel di Maria equalized from the penalty spot, signaling a complete shift in momentum. This turnaround, directly following the weather delay, underscored Enzo Maresca’s core philosophical objection to the situation. For him, the integrity of the game suffered irrevocably.
“This is Not Football”: Enzo Maresca’s Core Critique
Enzo Maresca did not mince words when articulating his personal view on the stoppage. “For me personally, it’s not football. You cannot be inside for two hours. It is something completely new.” While acknowledging the paramount importance of security reasons for suspending a game due to lightning threats, he pointed to the frequency of such occurrences as a red flag. “But if you suspend six, seven games that means that probably is not the right place to do this competition,” he asserted.
This direct challenge from Enzo Maresca isn’t merely about one game; it’s a broader critique of planning and execution for global tournaments. The manager later clarified that his “anger” wasn’t aimed at the competition itself, which he praised as “fantastic.” Instead, his frustration was squarely focused on the disruption caused by the weather, highlighting a significant difference from experiences in other established football regions. “It’s not normal to suspend a game. In a World Cup, how many games are suspended? Probably zero. In Europe, how many games? Zero,” Enzo Maresca stated, drawing a sharp contrast that resonates deeply with professional footballers and fans globally.
How Chelsea Coped: The Disruption Behind the Scenes
The immediate aftermath of the initial weather warning saw players, staff, and supporters swiftly pulled indoors. US safety regulations mandate this when thunderstorms are detected within an eight-mile radius of the venue. For Chelsea players like Marc Cucurella, Levi Colwill, and Tosin Adarabioyo, as well as Enzo Maresca himself, the sudden halt was met with palpable fury. They had been on course for a clear victory with only five minutes of normal time remaining.
Once inside the operations and dressing room area at the Bank of America Stadium, the challenge shifted to maintaining physical readiness. Players resorted to cycling on exercise bikes to keep their muscles warm and engaged in kick-ups to stay fresh. However, as Enzo Maresca explained, the mood inside was far from that of a professional match. “So two hours inside – people speak with the family outside [to check] if they were good with the security. People eating, laughing, talking on their mobiles. It was two hours. That’s why I said it’s not football.” This candid observation by Enzo Maresca painted a picture of a break that felt more like an informal pause than a strategic timeout, fundamentally undermining the competitive intensity of the game. Reece James corroborated this, adding, “It was quite disruptive when you’re in the flow of the game. Lots of substitutions – trying to get warm and stay warm. It was difficult and the climate was very hot and humid.” Even a senior Chelsea official acknowledged the palpable confusion and relief among the staff after the marathon match, which lasted an astounding four hours and 38 minutes from kick-off to the final whistle.
Competitive Integrity: A Deeper Concern Raised by Enzo Maresca’s Comments
Beyond the immediate impact on Chelsea’s specific match, the incident highlighted a far more significant problem: competitive integrity. In football, competitive integrity refers to the fundamental fairness of the contest and whether the conditions genuinely allow the most deserving team to win. Enzo Maresca’s experience underscored how unpredictable weather events can severely compromise this principle. When a team loses control due to an external factor like a two-hour delay, it’s not just an inconvenience; it can fundamentally alter the flow, momentum, and psychological state of players, potentially leading to “freak results.”
This issue extends far beyond the Club World Cup. With the 2026 World Cup set to be hosted across North America, Enzo Maresca’s concerns take on an even greater weight. National teams, with years of preparation and national pride on the line, could face similar stoppages. Such disruptions could impact participants unequally, introduce elements of chance that detract from pure sporting merit, and, as Enzo Maresca observed, fundamentally change the character of a match. The very concept of fairness in a global tournament becomes vulnerable when environmental factors so profoundly dictate play.
Is the US in Summer Suitable? A Pattern of Disruption
The Chelsea-Benfica game was not an isolated incident. The Club World Cup has seen multiple similar stoppages, reinforcing Enzo Maresca’s point about the unsuitability of the summer climate for continuous play in certain regions. Benfica themselves had endured another two-hour delay to the start of their match against Auckland City. In total, six similar stoppages occurred in five different cities during the tournament. These included games like Mamelodi Sundowns against Ulsan HD in Orlando, also due to heavy rain and storms.
Further instances of long pauses illustrate the pervasive nature of the problem:
- Palmeiras v Al-Ahly in New Jersey saw a 40-minute delay in the second half.
- Salzburg v Pachuca in Cincinnati experienced a significant 90-minute stoppage.
- Boca Juniors v Auckland City in Nashville endured a 50-minute pause.
Beyond thunderstorms, extreme heat has also plagued teams. Enzo Maresca himself stated it was “impossible” to conduct a normal training session at Chelsea’s previous base in Philadelphia due to the sweltering conditions. While some of the best stadiums in the US and Canada do boast covered roofs (like Atlanta’s Mercedes-Benz Stadium, which was the only such ground selected for the Club World Cup), many crucial venues for the upcoming 2026 World Cup do not. Even with covered stadiums in Vancouver, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, and Toronto for next summer’s World Cup, the expanded 48-team tournament means more matches and a higher likelihood of encountering these challenging weather events.
Possible Solutions and FIFA’s Stance on Maresca’s Concerns
The recurring issues raise critical questions about potential solutions. One commonly debated idea is moving the World Cup to winter months, a precedent set by Qatar in 2022 to avoid extreme summer heat. However, North America presents its own challenges in winter, with severe cold being an issue in many parts of the US and Canada, which could equally impact player performance and spectator comfort.
FIFA’s stance, articulated by Arsene Wenger, Head of its technical study group, from their base in Miami, acknowledges the problem but prioritizes safety. Wenger stated, “It’s not ideal, I agree, because you want the flow of the game from the first to the last minute but, as well, when you organise a competition you have [to put] security first.” This reflects FIFA’s dilemma: balancing the ideal competitive environment with the non-negotiable need for player and fan safety.
At the time of the Chelsea-Benfica incident, FIFA issued a statement: “Due to adverse weather conditions in Charlotte, including the risk of lightning in the vicinity of Bank of America Stadium, the Fifa Club World Cup match between SL Benfica and Chelsea FC has been suspended. Fifa will follow the established safety protocols, and the match will resume as soon as it’s safe to do so.” While this clarifies the immediate protocol, it doesn’t address the broader question of whether locations prone to such frequent safety-mandated stoppages are optimal long-term hosts for major, reputation-defining tournaments. This is the very crux of Enzo Maresca’s critique.
Enzo Maresca’s Pragmatism Amidst Frustration
Despite the clear frustration and strong language used, Enzo Maresca maintained a pragmatic perspective on the competition itself. “This is a fantastic competition. The Club World Cup is top; we are happy to be in the last eight,” he affirmed. His anger was not directed at the tournament’s format or prestige, but specifically at the unique circumstances brought about by the weather-induced suspension. This nuanced view highlights Enzo Maresca’s professional focus on optimal performance conditions for his team, and his commitment to the integrity of the game. It also offers a glimpse into Enzo Maresca’s managerial style – direct, honest, and unafraid to voice concerns that impact his players and the sport. His willingness to speak out, even on a global stage, underscores the seriousness with which he views such disruptions.
The Broader Implications for Football’s Global Calendar
Enzo Maresca’s pointed remarks contribute to a necessary and urgent dialogue within international football. As FIFA continues to expand its global calendar, hosting major tournaments in diverse geographical locations becomes increasingly common. This expansion inevitably brings challenges related to varied climates, infrastructure, and local safety regulations. The experiences at the Club World Cup serve as a crucial learning curve. Enzo Maresca’s comments, from a manager of a top-tier European club, will undoubtedly add weight to discussions within FIFA about future hosting criteria. The balance between geographical reach, commercial viability, player welfare, and maintaining the highest standards of competitive integrity will be a delicate one to strike. Proactive solutions, going beyond immediate safety protocols, might be needed to ensure that the spectacle of football, particularly at its highest levels, remains uninterrupted and fair.
Conclusion: Enzo Maresca’s Voice and the Future of Football in North America
The forthright comments from Enzo Maresca following Chelsea’s Club World Cup match have sparked a critical debate about the practicalities of hosting major football tournaments in certain climates. His assertion that “This is not football” after a near two-hour weather delay resonates with anyone who values the continuity and competitive integrity of the beautiful game. While player safety is paramount and rightly prioritized, the frequency and duration of these stoppages, as observed by Enzo Maresca, raise significant questions about the long-term suitability of venues where such events are common during key competition periods. As the 2026 World Cup approaches, North America’s summer weather will be under intense scrutiny. Enzo Maresca’s experience serves as a powerful reminder that while the show must go on, the conditions under which it proceeds are equally vital for upholding the spirit and fairness of football on the global stage. His voice adds a crucial perspective to FIFA’s ongoing planning, emphasizing the need for robust strategies to mitigate climate challenges and ensure that competitive integrity remains uncompromised for future generations of football.